Volume 1, Issue 1 (Spring & summer 2007)                   IJPBS 2007, 1(1): 27-29 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rasoulian M, Taghva A, Panaghi L, Salehi M, Zahiraldin A, Ghalebandi M F. A qualitative Study of Psychiatrists’ View about a Pilot Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Iran. IJPBS. 2007; 1 (1) :27-29
URL: http://ijpbs.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-147-en.html
Abstract:   (7371 Views)
Objective: In Aug 2004, for the first time, a psychiatric OSCE was piloted in Iran. The objective of current study was to explore the view and opinion of both candidates and examiners after they took part in the exam.
Method: Two focus groups were formed. There were 10 participants in each group. Each group was asked to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the OSCE. The discussion was tape recorded and then converted into a script before being analyzed.
Results: Standard format of the exam and its unbiased evaluation of candidates’ abilities were reported as the most significant advantages of OSCE. However, participants criticized the artificiality of the setting and use of simulated patients.
Conclusion: Although expensive and time consuming to organize, OSCE was viewed as a standard and fair method of assessing candidates’ skills. To overcome the artificiality of the setting, participants asked for a better training of the actors and actresses.
Full-Text [PDF 48 kb]   (1212 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Psychiatry
Received: 2012/05/28 | Accepted: 2014/01/6 | Published: 2014/01/6

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
Write the security code in the box

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb